Formerly known as "True Confessions of a Mormon Mother" ... Identity (of the blog) crisis in progress
Friday, February 27, 2009
Limits.
"Mommy, I'm hunnnggggggrrryyy!"
"We'll have a snack with Joseph when he gets home."
"But I'm hunnnnnggggrrrrryyyyyyyyy..."
{repeat infinitely for several minutes}
"Elijah, Joseph is home. Snack time!"
...
"Elijah! Come downstairs!"
...
"Elijah! Snack time!"
"Elijah, do you want some cake?" {Yes, we believe in healthy snacks at our house. But we're also eating up leftover birthday cake... five of them..."}
"No, don't like carrot cake."
"Do you want some of your chocolate cake?"
"Mmhmm."
"Okay, do you want some of your ice cream?"
"Mmhmm."
...
"WWWaaaaaah!!! Don't want cake and ice cream!!"
"But you just said..."
"Waaaaahh! Don't want cake and ice cream in that bowl! I want a big bowl!"
...
"Here you go. A big bowl."
"Waaaaah!!! Don't want cake and ice cream touching."
"You want them not touching each other?"
"Waaaaaaahhhhhhhyyyeessss."
Sigh.
"Don't want cake!!"
"Okay, there you go. No more cake. Eat your ice cream."
"Waaaaaah!! Don't want ice cream!"
"Okay, Thomas can eat your ice cream. Here, Tommy."
"Waaaaah!!! I want ICE CREAM!!!"
"But... but...."
"Don't want the dirty bowl!! NEW BOWL!"
"But you already have TWO bowls... I'll clean one of them for you, so it doesn't have any cake crumbs, okay? Which one do you want me to clean for your ice cream?"
"Small one."
"This one?"
"Mmhmm."
...
"Here you go. New clean bowl."
"Waaaaah!! I want a big bowl!"
"No. You said you wanted this bowl. Do you want ice cream now?"
"Mmhmm."
"Okay, here is some ice cream."
"Waaaaaahhh! I don't want ice cream!"
sigh
"Waaaah! I want CAKE!!"
sigh
"Mommy!!!!!"
"What?"
"Don't talk with food in your mouth! WAAAAAHHHH!"
"Okay, I swallowed. What do you..."
"WAAAAHHHH! Don't say that!"
"Don't say what?"
"MOMMMMYYYYYY!"
"What?"
"DON'T SAY WHAT!!!"
"Wha...?"
"DON'T SAY WHAT!!! WAAAAHHH!"
"Umm... Yes, Elijah?"
"Mommy!!!!"
"Yes?"
"Don't say YES!!!"
"What do you want, Elijah?"
"WAAAAHHH!!!"
sigh. start blogging.
"MOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"
"MOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"
"MOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"
"MOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"
"MOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"
"MOOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!"
Conquering rising feelings of frustration.
"Yes, Elijah?"
"DON'T SAY YES!!! SAY WHAT!!!"
sigh. Time to wrap this blog entry up.
All of you parents know what I'm talking about. I think I'm going to go lock myself in my room.
Prologue:
I didn't lock the door. The crying followed. I turned the computer around. This is what I saw:
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Book Talk :: The Wayward Bus
The Wayward Bus
by John Steinbeck
I loved this book. Around midnight last night, I was torn between reading the last few chapters despite my 6 a.m. alarm that was set or saving a treat for myself in the morning. I ended up saving the book as a treat, but I had trouble falling asleep with the characters still dancing in my head.
The book starts slowly and builds as the characters are more fully drawn out. The plot of the story is simple on the outside, but infinetely complex as you look inside each character. I was glad that I had read the first few pages of the introduction to this book (a practice I almost universally avoid due to plot spoilers) because John Steinbeck's enthusiasm for this novel, as quoted in the introduction, carried me through the first slow-moving chapters.
When the novel finished, I found myself with a hundred questions about what would happen to each character as the bus ride (and book) concluded. In that sense, the ending was frustrating and unfulfilling. However, it is proof positive to me that the book is the best sort: it pulled me into its universe and made me actually care what was happening.
The introduction to the book discussed the allegorical nature of the characters and storyline. While some of that seemed a bit forced to me, I did recognize the importance of what Steinbeck was really saying. The book is about human nature. It is about people and interactions and the way our lives are intertwined.
What I particularly loved about this novel was the way in which an unlikely group of people came together first with distaste and distrust and learned to work together, be curious about each other and even love each other. The circumstances of the bus ride forced them each out of their comfort zone and into a foreign world.
One would like to say they each became more tolerant because of the journey, but that didn't seem to be true. However, shared experiences and forced discomfort left an impression on each of them and gave them the great gift of teaching them all a little about themselves.
Monday, February 23, 2009
My Dirty Little Secret
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Empty Places in my Head
Friday, February 20, 2009
I'm getting dumber, one microblurb at a time
Juliana is feeling super energetic and excited about life.10:03am
Juliana is looking forward to two days in sunny California next week! Seriously, nobody wants to watch my kids? Have you seen how CUTE my kids are? ;). 6:38pm
Juliana is in pain and hoping it goes away quickly.8:03am
Juliana is recovering from the joys of a CT scan.2:26pm
Juliana discovered the cause of her pain ... an ovarian cyst ... no worries for now :). 3:51pm
Juliana is feelin' happy again. 5:13pm
Juliana needs to get a grip. 10:07am
Juliana is updating her Facebook status. 8:35pm
Juliana is waiting patiently for the time when I drive to the airport. 2:08pm
Juliana is enjoying semi-sunny California. 9:45pm
Juliana has been awake for hours ... while her sister and nephew are still sound asleep... aww the curse of being a morning person! 10:10am
Juliana has less than 24 hours until she returns to frigid Utah.10:49pm
Juliana is home again and has Portos pastries for those who want to come try 'em out! 10:11pm
Juliana is tidying the effects of an afternoon with three little boys. 4:25pm
Juliana has a long name. 6:26pm
Juliana just discovered an awesome party going on at the No.Orem Maceys ... my kids had a blast! 12:55pm
Juliana is going to strangle Facebook's chat feature.8:07pm
Juliana has a cold. 7:54am
Juliana has finished four books in four days. This is an ominous sign for the housework. 2:58pm
Juliana used to think that rainy weather made my children sleep in. This morning's pre-6 a.m. awakening by two of the three is evidence that my theory was flawed. 6:27pm
Juliana is planning the twins' preschool for next year. Who wants to carpool to the UVU preschool (held at Orem Elementary)? It's THE BEST! 9:43am
Juliana is adapting her chocolate ice cream recipe to make it a toasted hazelnut Nutella chocolate ice cream... It's can't turn out badly, can it? 3:12pm
Juliana is finishing up "The Comforts of a Muddy Saturday."4:32pm
Juliana is yawning ... Preschoolers who wake me up five times in the middle of the night are very disruptive. 10:57am
Juliana has been awake with sick kids since 3:30 a.m. This should be interesting. 7:46am
Juliana met her husband 14 years ago this evening.3:19pm
Juliana totally forgot the Valentine's for preschool until the last second. Oops... 12:30pm
Juliana likes the flair. 4:14pm
Juliana is feeling the sleep deprivation slowing her down.2:26pm
Juliana might be getting a cooking lesson from the chef of Costa Vida! 4:08pm
Juliana is enjoying a peaceful Saturday and Valentine's Day sugar cookies :). 11:59am
Juliana is stressed with three screaming, arguing boys.9:57am
Juliana is finally back to a happy schedule with the kids in school. 9:14am
Juliana is impressed that Facebook is so willing to listen to the users. 7:22am
Juliana is singin' the blues ... off key. 6:58pm
Juliana wants to know what you would ask the head chef of Costa Vida to teach you if you were going to get a private cooking lesson? 2:48pm
Juliana is feeling guilty about using a cake mix for her son's birthday cake instead of going homemade. The homemade chocolate-mint-Oreo ice cream will make up for it.12:09pm
Juliana is blogging about micro-blogging. 9:14pm
Saturday, February 07, 2009
Book Talk :: North and South
A: Elizabeth Gaskell's "North and South."
It would be hard not to compare this book with Jane Austen's "Pride and Prejudice," since they are both Victorian novels, written by women, about unlikely lovers who seem to hate each other all the way until ... they don't hate each other anymore.
While Jane Austen's work are, in my rather sentimental mind, perfection itself, this book left me irritated and unsatisfied, the way Stephenie Meyers' books do. The irritation arises from the fact that the book could have been so much more than it is. I feel the same irritation when I read the Meyers' books, which really do have interesting plots and concepts, but really fall short in execution.
So a quick disclaimer: I really enjoyed reading this novel and, my apologies to Ms. Meyers, this book was infinitely better than most modern novels. And now, forgive me as I tear it to shreds. First off, let's start at the end. The entire book seems to build toward the ultimate Happily Ever After, which would, of course, be the wedded bliss of our heroine, Margaret. Yet when that climatic event occurs, it is anticlimactic to say the least. It is hurried. It is illogical. There is nothing in the scene to dictate that this is a logical moment for our hero to speak. Yet he does. And what does he say? "Margaret... Margaret... Margaret..." How does she reply? She puts her head down on the table. Then he puts his arms around her.
And that is our climatic love scene?!? Weak! I felt cheated. Then the book just abruptly ends. This was the worst sort of "a woman's only joy is to find marriage" drivel I could imagine. At least "Pride & Prejudice" gives us a humorous and witty account of what happens after they are married.
Secondly, the amount of melodrama amazed me. Not one, not two, not three, but four main characters die in quick succession. The first two have been hinted at so long that I was rather bored with the fact that it took them so long to kick the bucket. The last two were senseless, sudden and melodramatic. Yes, poor Margaret is living a sad life. Okay, you've made your point. And then some.
Lastly, the characters themselves were overly weak, melodramatic and illogical. The amount of swooning and fainting in this novel was amazing[ly pathetic]. Seriously, how can I take a main character seriously when she is constantly swooning? How many times did she hit the floor or lay on the couch unconscious?
While I'm on a roll, the constant sickness and death was far too mysterious for me. Things were constantly referred to in oblique terms and not explained to the reader. Are we supposed to guess what the disease is when the only hints given are pain, tiredness and the knowledge that the person can never get better? I'm sorry, but that is a bit too obscure for my untrained mind. And it irritated me, because so much of the story revolved around these mystery illnesses.
Now that I've got that out of my system, I'll state again that I did enjoy reading this novel. The story was complex, which is to my taste, and had a bit of historical context, which is somewhat like fiber: it's good for me, whether I like it or not. Unfortunately, I can see why this classic is not a true classic like "Pride & Prejudice." It dragged in places, was overly dramatic and left a lot wanting in many areas.
One of the reasons I put this book on my "To Read" list was the note that the author, Elizabeth Gaskell, had been mentored by none other than the great Charles Dickens. I'm afraid that my opinion of Dickens, who edited this novel, actually went down after finishing this book.
Monday, February 02, 2009
O.P.E.R.ation: Internet
Your mother-in-law is annoyed. She has been planning this perfect gift for months. She special-ordered it from Sweden. And now you hardly seem excited at all. She thinks you don't like it. In your heart, you are touched and overwhelmed, but that cursed cold just makes an enthusiastic response impossible.
You've fallen victim to what I call: Obligation to Provide an Emotional Response (O.P.E.R.) Most people gauge your feelings by what they view as your emotional response to what is being said or done. You seem happy: they assume you're happy. You seem sad: they assume you're sad. This is fairly straightforward, but can cause problems because our emotions are not always straightforward.
I hate opening gifts in front of other people because of the O.P.E.R. I don't perform well under pressure. In fact, when I feel that a specific emotional response is expected, I generally have performance anxiety and the performance comes out flat. Then I feel like I've let down the gift giver and given them the impression that I'm not overwhelmingly enthusiastic about the new pot holder they gave me. (Errr ... okay, so sometimes my lack of Emotional Response is rather genuine, I admit.)
I also hate to put others under an Obligation to Provide an Emotional Response. It's just this weird thing about me. I'd prefer that others open my presents when I'm not there, unless it's something I'm really jazzed about. (Sorry, Alyson, I had to give you THAT gift in person! I was way too excited about it!)
Which brings me to the point of all this: the internet. I think this is the reason why people so frequently choose email or Facebook or Instant Messaging over face-to-face (or phone-to-phone) communication. There is no O.P.E.R. attached. Or if there is, there is a delayed obligation and the second party has plenty of time to word their feelings appropriately--even delete, revise, adjust, get feedback about, sleep on and reword those feelings until they are expressed with just the right amount of oomph.
When I email someone and ask a favor, I know they have time to think it over, look at their calendar and talk to their spouse before agreeing to the favor. Calling them on the phone feels like I'm putting them on the spot. I hate doing that. When my Dad emails me to ask what my kids would like for Christmas, I have time to look over the amazon.com wishlist I made for them, decide which items I'll be investing in personally and then send him a well-thought-out reply with good suggestions.
Facebook is even vaguer. I can communicate outward to whoever is connected to me, not knowing who will read my message or when it will be read. Therefore, there is almost no O.P.E.R. When people do reply, it is a surprise and a gift. When people do not reply, there is no problem because there was no obligation involved. The same holds true with blogging. You are under no obligation to read this insanely periphrastic rambling. (That was a great Word of the Day a few weeks ago... describes me, unfortunately, too well.)
If you do read it, I have no way of knowing you read it, so I will never know what your Emotional Response was (nausea? embarrassment? a knowing shake of the head side to side?) unless you choose to leave a comment and put it in words (which you can revise, edit and even choose to delete if you prefer.)
Despite all that, I'm not a person to sit here and feel content with my laptop and a bowl of chocolates. I need people ... not just in the safety of the low expectations of the cyber world. I need to laugh with you, talk with you and cry with you. So let's get together. Email me and we'll figure out when.